<

Blob Blog

Monsanto’s New Idea For Suing Farmers

DISINFO REPORTS!

Is the big, bad monster of biotech going to back off its aggressive litigation to force farmers to join their evil empire of GMO seeds? Maybe… Report via NPR:

For years, the biotech giant Monsanto has provoked outrage among its critics for suing farmers who save and replant seeds from the company’s patented Roundup Ready crops, such as soybeans and canola.

Some of that outrage is based on a decade-old case in Canada, in which a court ruled that a farmer, Percy Schmeiser, violated Monsanto’s patents by planting canola that he “knew or ought to have known” contained Monsanto’s Roundup Ready gene. Schmeiser argued that he didn’t want the gene in his fields, and that it had become incorporated into his canola via wind-blown pollen.

Monsanto won that case, but the company might have been better off losing because the victory has been a public relations disaster. Around the world, many people now believe, mistakenly, that Monsanto is suing farmers for growing patented seeds that wandered into their fields without the farmers’ knowledge and against their will.

So it caught our attention last week when a lawyer representing Monsanto in federal court seemed to admit that suing Schmeiser had been a mistake that the company would not repeat.

The lawyer for Monsanto, Seth Waxman, was being questioned by Judge William Bryson, from the U.S. Appeals Court for the Federal Circuit. In the case, a group of mostly organic farmers had hauled Monsanto into court, claiming that they are being damaged by the possibility that Monsanto might sue them. Bryson wanted to know what actions would convince Monsanto to sue a farmer, and Waxman came up with this:

“In the real world, Judge Bryson, the cases Monsanto brings are cases in which it has come to learn that the farmer is not purchasing any Roundup Ready seed, but is spraying his fields with Roundup, and the plants are surviving. If the farmer were not spraying, by definition he wouldn’t be taking advantage of Monsanto’s technology.”

Under Waxman’s common-sense standard, Monsanto wouldn’t have brought its case against Schmeiser. That’s because in that case, the company did not produce any evidence that Schmeiser was taking advantage of Monsanto’s technology by spraying his crop with Roundup…

[continues at NPR]

— By Akira The Don on Wednesday, January 16th, 2013

Share & Commen
Tags:
  • Seacrudge

    I think this is what happened: Monsanto realized that they couldn’t stop the GM seed blowing into other farmers’ fields once it was released to the public. They knew they’d be facing lawsuits from organic farmers for contamination of their crops. So, rather than be defending a bunch of contamination lawsuits, they decided to get in front of the issue, and use their lawyers and govt connections to sue farmers first – for illicit use of their seed. And it has worked, so far.

    But the result is this insane situation where you, as a farmer, end up getting sued for Monsanto’s seed contaminating your crops. Because Monsanto is implementing a policy of sterilization and depopulation which comes down from the highest level, no Western national govt can stop them. They are connected to military/energy sector in ways that makes them more powerful than most national governments.

    However, from Monsanto’s POV, you can see why they felt they needed to go on the attack. It was either that or likely get sued by every organic farmer in N America for contamination.

    Today, nearly all processed foods contain GMOs. Fortunately, there are better tasting and much healthier whole food and organic alternatives, tho they are more expensive in the short term. (In the long term you save money on medical bills).